How TypeJung reads 42 answers into a function-stack map
How TypeJung groups 42 prompts into four evidence layers, infers the dominant and inferior functions, scores reliability, and what it does not claim.
The assessment gathers four kinds of evidence — behavioural scenarios, inferior-function stress signals, somatic indicators, and Jungian attitude direction — and looks for the function pattern they agree on, instead of asking you to self-label.
The strongest function channel becomes the candidate dominant; the inferior is detected from stress triggers opposite the dominant rather than simply the lowest score; attitude direction then orients the stack into function-attitude codes. A near-even attitude split is reported as balanced.
Every result carries a reliability label — High, Moderate, or Exploratory — based on how much the four layers agreed. TypeJung is educational self-reflection, not a clinical or diagnostic assessment, and a function-stack code is a working hypothesis, not a fixed identity.
Start the free assessment